+44 (0) 20 8405 6789
sales@etscablecomponents.com
Call
You are here: HomeArchives for admin

admin

Considerations When Choosing Cable Glands

by

There are a number of factors that need to be considered when choosing the correct type of cable glands for industrial applications.

Unnecessary problems, such as time wasted on site can be caused if the glands ordered are the incorrect size or type. These problems can be reduced by paying attention to the following considerations when specifying what glands are required.

Cable Gland Selection Guidelines

For all cables:

  • Determine the type of cable being terminated
  • Identify the construction, size and material properties of the cable used

For armoured cables:

  • Check the material used for cable armouring (Aluminium Wire Armoured and Steel Wire Armoured etc) and specify the gland is manufactured from the correct material. i.e. brass, aluminium, nickel-plating
  • Check the inside diameter of cable against the gland manufacturer specifications
  • Check the outside diameter of the cable
  • Identify the environment of gland installation and consider any corrosion protection requirements
  • Check the ingress protection (IP) rating required by the equipment and application
  • Consider if an entry thread seal is required for IP66 ratings and above
  • Check whether other cable gland accessories are required (locknuts, earth tags etc)
  • Check the gland meets necessary requirements if being installed within Hazardous Areas
  • Identify the equipment entry thread and size and consider if any thread adaptors or converters are required
  • Consider any unused cable entries and specify stopper plugs if needed

It is recommended that extra time for correct and proper cable gland selection be included within a purchasing schedule, in order to reduce the likelihood of inconvenience and time wasting at the critical point of installation.

ETS are happy to assist, at no cost, in carrying out gland selection and sizing in the event of a contractor having a cabling schedule. Please contact our Sales Team for more information about this service.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

Genuine LSF Gland Shrouds vs Non-Genuine LSF Shrouds

by

In recent years there has been a massive influx of imported products, such as cable gland shrouds, which claim to have equal characteristics to their traditional counterparts. Our video outlines the difference in quality between genuine LSF gland shrouds and ‘economy’ LSF shrouds.


Transcription:

“The following video clip demonstrates the differences in so called LSF termination components. The first shroud in the video is an imported low smoke alternative, which is marketed by some companies as a cost effective or economy LSF range.

As the demonstration shows, the shroud immediately catches alight emitting a thick black toxic smoke and does not exhibit any self-extinguishing characteristics. This is clearly not LSF. In addition, glands that these shrouds are generally supplied with are inferior in both design a brass content, causing badly fitting components and poor earthing capabilities. If you are asking for an improved LSF termination, is this the quality of material you would expect?

Genuine LSF, low smoke and fume components, are designed to exhibit self extinguishing characteristics, and only emit white, semi-transparent, non-toxic smoke in the event of combustion taking place. This allows fire exit signs to still be visible, enabling trap persons a safe passage through smoke, which contains no poisonous toxins, namely halogens.

This shroud is a genuine LSF Zero Halogen product, as manufactured by CMP Products. It is clearly self extinguishing and emits only white, non-toxic smoke. The material used in the manufacture of these shrouds has been independently tested by London Underground technical services and as such, as been certified for use on both LUL’s network and many other mass transit systems, the world over.

If you request a LSF product, this is the quality of material that you should expect.”

If you would like more information on what makes an LSF cable gland shroud high quality, please leave your comment below.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

Earthing Requirements of Cable Glands Used on SWA Cables

by

When cable glands are used to terminate SWA (Steel Wire Armour) cables, the gland must be able to provide earth continuity from the termination of the armour through to the body of the equipment, either via the enclosure itself (if it is metallic), via a gland plate or through an external earth path with the use of an earth tag.

Direct To Ground Earthing

Typically when earthing an armoured cable, a number of direct-to-ground external earth link cables are used and connected to the cable gland through an earth tag. As a minimum requirement, the cable will be earthed at least one of its two ends, meaning in the event of a fault or short-circuit the most direct route to ground will be achieved.

‘Daisy Chain’ Earthing

If multiple cable entries are required in a non-metallic equipment enclosures, a ‘daisy-chain’ earthing method can be adopted. Wherein an external earth cable is connected to an earth tag within each cable gland, with at least one earth tag used to connect the earthing cable directly to ground, typically via an earth bar.

Earth Tags or CIEL Glands?

The above methods of earthing SWA cables via cable glands, can be achieved by adding the relevant aluminium or brass slip-on earth tags to the required gland assembly, this method would be suitable where lower levels of short-circuit protection are required. If higher levels of short-circuit protection are needed, in Medium Voltage installations for example, cable glands with a heavy duty Cast Integral Earth Electrical Lugs can be supplied. These CWCIEL glands are suitable for MV installations between 11kV – 33kV and are also available in both brass and aluminium variants.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

How engineering has changed on the London Underground in the past 150 years

by

2013 marked the 150th year since the London Underground became the first underground rail system. On that day, around 40,000 people were carried on the service that ran between Farringdon Street and Paddington.

Since the early days of gas lit platforms, steam powered trains and class division and now with around 3.5 million daily users, the tube system has come a long way since then. We look back on the history and practices of the victorian era and look at how they have evolved into the standards and codes of practice prevalent on the LU network today.

The worlds first underground network

When it was first opened, the London Underground was the first of its kind in the world, it was a pioneer of engineering and has driven many developments since then. One of the biggest differences compared to the current underground was the development of increased safety measures. In its early days the tube was remarkably different to the modern day system we know today. A key difference was the use of steam powered carriages.

The problems of using steam trains in an underground environment were obvious from the very first day, with a porter being taken to hospital and several passengers having to leave the platforms due to the smoke and fumes. In efforts to improve the air quality within stations, even smoking was restricted, as to reduce its contribution to the poor air quality.

Electric powered carriages

Electric locomotives were first used on the London underground as early as 1890, with the district and circle lines switched fully from steam power to electricity in 1905. Although it wasn’t until 1961 when the last steam-hauled passenger trains were replaced.

With the introduction of a fully electrical underground rail system, old systems would have to be upgraded to accommodate the new power cables and supplied that lined the tunnels. Introducing the use of various cabling accessories such as cable hangers, cleats and flexible conduits.

Introduction of LUL approval and LUL standard 1-085

In 1987, a fire broke out at the Kings Cross underground station where 31 people lost their lives and 100 others were injured during the incident. It was revealed after the accident that the fire itself was only part of the reason for the deaths and injuries. Many of the products used on the London underground during the time contained harmful hydrocarbons that not only released harmful, toxic smoke which affected the breathing of the victims but also burnt with a thick black smoke, severely reducing their visibility and ability to find the exits.

As a result of the tragedy, the Fire Precautions (Sub-Surface Railways Stations) Regulations were introduced in 1989. These regulations, also known as Section 12, require that all electrical equipment within the Underground Network must adhere to strict safety standards.

All electrical cable and accessories installed within Section 12 locations must meet the requirements of LUL standard 1-085. This standard outlines the fire safety performance of the materials used, including smoke emission, flammability and flame spread.

Demand for LSFZeroHalogen (LSZH) products

Since the Kings Cross fire, the use of halogenated compounds within the LUL network has been restricted and more low-smoke, zero (or low) halogen products have been specified. When exposed to flame, these LSZH products not only burn a much less toxic smoke, but the smoke is white in colour, minimising its effect on visibility during a fire.

Manufacturers are now able to supply products that have these LSF properties while maintaining the performance of their traditional counterparts.

Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI)

It should be understood that just because a product is classed as halogen free does not indicate fire resistance or self-extinguishing properties. The Limiting Oxygen Index (BSEN ISO 4589) determines the percentage of oxygen in the atmosphere that would need to be present for the material to combust. The oxygen percentage present in the air during normal conditions is 21%, meaning the higher the percentage, the greater flame retardency.

Since the 1987 fire, the rail industry set standards that all materials used in underground passenger carriages demand an LOI of 34% of greater, compared to 28% LOI on overground rolling stock. This shows the extra precautions now being taken on the LUL network.

Full LUL product range

We are able to offer a wide range of LSFZeroHalogen and LUL approved products, suitable for use within the London Underground network and other mass-transit systems. Key LUL approved products include cable cleats, glands and trackside flexible conduits.

Engineering the London Underground Video:

Watch this short film made to inspire the next generation of engineers.

The film takes you on a trip through the Tube’s history to the present day and celebrates 150 years of civil engineering on the Tube.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

The Importance of Correctly Cleating Cables

by

The importance of correctly cleating cables in a trefoil formation within electrical installations is frequently underestimated, often due to a lack of understanding. Many people assume cleats are used purely to hold the power cables to the desired route, but for an installation of single core cabling system to be deemed safe, it is vital these cables are restrained in a manner which is able to withstand the forces generated in potentially lethal short-circuit situations.

The below video shows an example of the extreme force that can be generated by a short-circuit:


More awareness yet inferior products

In recent decades, the demand for electrical power has risen dramatically and specifiers are becoming more aware of the issues involved with incorrectly cleating trefoil cable formations, but issues still occur with inferior quality products within the market-place.

To address the issue of inferior products, in addition to the existing European Standard (EN 50368), there is now an international standard which provides global recognition of the need to provide suitable restraint for power cables; IEC 61914:2009.

Up-to-date international accreditation

Coupled with the International standard, it is equally important that any product specified is capable of demonstrating its suitability for the required task. It is no longer acceptable that in-house testing certificates are used as proof of a products pedigree and this is why current, third-party testing is vital.

Here at ETS, we continue to believe that only the highest quality, UK-manufactured, EN and IEC standard conforming cable cleats should be used. Our expertise and extensive cleat range allows us to supply cleats designed specifically for the task and third-party accredited as such.

We also provide a service that can recommend which type of cleat should be used and importantly, the spacing interval the cleat should be fixed for each project application. This is calculated from the short-circuit withstand installation requirement and the diameter and construction of the cable being installed.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

Heat Shrink vs Cold Shrink: Knowing When Each One Is More Suitable

by

Cold Shrink and Heat Shrink tubing may appear similar from the outside, but their key characteristics are very different. Both types of tubing have different installation techniques, applications and physical properties.

HeatShrink and ColdShrink tubing can be used for a variety of cabling applications including: terminating, splicing and providing environmental seals on LV and MV cables. More than price, ease of use and environmental conditions should be taken into consideration when choosing the most suitable product.

The differences

The most obvious differences between the two products are how each of them is applied. Cold Shrink comes stretched over a removable plastic core, allowing the tube to be slid over the application, the core removed and the tubing will contract to create a watertight-seal around the cable or connection due to the ‘active memory’ contained within the EPDM rubber or silicone material. Heat Shrink, also comes pre-stretched but as a sleeve rather than over a removable core. The sleeve requires a heat source for installation, usually from a gas torch, to heat the polyolefin tubing so that it shrinks to its original size, creating a seal over the cable or joint.

Silicone-rubber Cold Shrink tubing has the greater UV-resistance of all the types of cold or heat-applied tubing and is therefore used in outdoor, exposed environments, for example: trackside terminations to rail power lines. EPDM rubber is also used in Cold Shrink tubings and is much more abrasion resistant than other cold or heat-applied products, being ideally suited for direct burial applications such as cable-to-cable jointing.

Cold Shrink tubing has an “active memory” seal characteristic, meaning the tubing is always trying to return to its original size and able to maintain its sealing capability around cables as they expand and contract under large load-swings or temperature fluctuations.

Another advantage of Cold Shrink tubing is that, because there is no direct flame required to install components, there is a reduced risk to the installer, especially in the presence of combustible gasses. Hot-work permits are not required and quality and reliability of the installation is guaranteed due to fewer critical installation techniques, with resultant time and cost savings.

The polyolefin-based material used in Heat Shrink is resistant to most chemicals and also becomes very rigid once it has been heated, therefore making it a good choice for mechanical protection. However, the downside to this rigidity is the products inability to expand and contract with the cable, meaning an environmental seal cannot be maintained without the aid of hot-melt adhesives or mastic tapes. Heat Shrink materials are not suited for installation areas experiencing high heat or humidity, but are ideal for use in most industrial/commercial installations where operating temperatures are below 90oC and where chemical resistance is required.

Video: ColdShrink Joint vs HeatShrink Joint

Knowing which one to choose

Every cabling installation has a number of different requirements when it comes to chemical, abrasion and moisture resistance. When adding space limitations and temperature considerations into the equation, choosing the correct product can become difficult and confusing. Ultimately, ETS can provide a vast selection of Heat Shrink and Cold Shrink products to suit a wide variety of cable accessory requirements from low-voltage straight joints, all the way up to 72kV distribution line terminations.

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please share it!

Useful Links
Contact ETS

For up to date technical data please get in touch

020 8405 6789
E.T.S. (Portsmouth) Limited T/A ETS Cable Components
Unit 43, Barwell Business Park
Leatherhead Road, Chessington
Surrey, KT9 2NY
Get Social
ETS Accreditations
ISO 9001 Certified Company
FORS Fleet Operator Recogintion Scheme ID: 002140
RISQS Verified
Achilles UVDB Silver Plus
ISO 14001 Certified Company
FORS Practitioner

Copyright 2024 ETS Cable Components. All rights reserved. Website by Tiga Creative Marketing Kent.